Articles
CJPLS: VOL. 14, NO. 1, JUNE 2026
Gender but not parental educational assortative mating is associated with mate selection preference among undergraduate students in a Nigerian university
Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijagun, Ogun State
Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijagun, Ogun State
Tai Solarin University of Education, Ijagun, Ogun State
-
Submitted
-
May 20, 2025
-
Published
-
2026-04-01
Abstract
Assortative mating, particularly educational homogamy, significantly influences mate selection; however, the relative influence of gender and parental educational background remains under-examined in sub-Saharan African contexts. This study examined the associations between gender and parental educational assortative mating (PEAM) and mate selection preferences among 985 undergraduate students at a Nigerian university. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics, parental educational background, and mate selection preferences. Separate binary logistic regression models were estimated for each mate selection criterion, adjusting for parental education and age. Strong preferences were observed for partners who are bold and confident (93%) and who dress attractively (70%); moderate preferences for religious (67%), sport-loving (65%), social (56%), and same-age (54%) partners; but low preferences for partners' (un)troublesomeness (45%), profession (44%), complexion (43%), and height (43%). Gender emerged as a consistent correlate of several mate preferences, whereas PEAM showed limited independent associations. Females were significantly more likely than males to prioritise a partner’s age (62% higher odds), height (34% higher odds), and profession (30% higher odds), but were less likely to prioritise boldness and confidence. These findings suggest that gender-related sociocultural factors may play a more salient role than parental educational matching in shaping mate preferences among this population. Interpretations are limited to the institutional context studied, and further multi-site research is recommended.
References
- REFERENCES
- Servedio MR. The evolution of assortative mating in humans. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2016;31(7):427–9.
- Xiao Y, Qian Y. Educational assortative mating and family income inequality in China. Demography. 2020;57(5):1741–61.
- Andrade SB, Thomsen JP. Educational assortative mating: a micro‐educational approach. Br J Sociol. 2019;70(4):1245–75.
- Boertien D, Permanyer I. Educational assortative mating as a determinant of changing household income inequality: A 21-country study. Eur Sociol Rev. 2019;35(4):522–37.
- Leesch J, Katrňák T, Skopek J. Structural opportunities or assortative mating? Decomposing trends and country differences in educational sorting outcomes in marriages. Eur Soc. 2024;26(4):1137–69.
- Wittemann A, Yastrebov G. Educational homogamy and its implications in post-industrial societies. J Marriage Fam. 2024;86(1):101-17.
- Choi KH, Tienda M. Gender and educational differentials in marital sorting of Hispanic young adults. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2021;696(1):179–97.
- Imamura AE. Ordinary couples? Mate selection in international marriage in Nigeria. J Comp Fam Stud. 1986;17(1):33–42.
- Choi KH, Denice P. Racial/ethnic variation in the relationship between educational assortative mating and wives' income trajectories. Demography. 2023;60(1):227–54.
- Frisell T, Pawitan Y, Långström N, Lichtenstein P. Heritability, assortative mating and gender differences in violent crime. Behav Genet. 2012;42(1):3–18.
- Klümper L, Hassebrauck M, Schwarz S. Intersexual and intrasexual differences in mate selection preferences. Arch Sex Behav. 2024;53(1):177–203.
- Musikhina Y. Gender Differences in Motivation for Success and Their Impact. Eur J Gender Stud. 2024;1(1):34–43.
- Buss DM, Schmitt DP. Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. In: Interpersonal Development. Routledge; 2017. p. 297–325.
- March EM. Sex differences in mate preferences: An exploration of evolutionary and socio-economic theories [dissertation]. Australian Catholic University; 2016.
- Feng AJ. Revisiting horizontal stratification in higher education: College prestige hierarchy and educational assortative mating in China. Demography. 2022;59(1):349–69.
- Byun SY, Bai Y, Chung HJ. Consequences of educational assortative mating for children’s academic outcomes. In: Korean Families Yesterday and Today. 2020. p. 95–118.
- Hur YM. Assortative mating for educational level in parents of public school children in Lagos, Nigeria. Behav Genet. 2016;46:596–602.