The study is a comparative analysis of three Nigerian news media websites’ framing of 2024 #EndBadGovernance protests. It is underpinned by Framing, Gatekeeping and Agenda Setting theoretical frameworks. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was adapted to get a sample of 520 out of 610 #Endbadgovernance related headlines. Quantitative content analysis was used within the context of composite framing, namely Generic, Time, Spaces and Valence frames. Finding shows that The Nation down played the protest by giving it 5 times lesser coverage than the average for all the three websites studied. Punch downplayed it more. Respectively, under the Generic and Time news framing categories, the Episodic and the Present frames were found to be dominant the three websites narratives. However, in the Space framing category, ‘ Nation’ frame mattered more on The Nation and Punch websites, while the ‘ State’ frame was dominant in Sahara Reporters’ . Conclusions reached are that Sahara Reporters is prone to significantly engage the Reaction Frame and Attribution of Responsibility Frame which were greatly diminished in both The Nation and Punch websites. The study recommends that Punch should give adequate nation-wide coverage to social movements to stem over reliance of the public on politically exposed news media for information. It also recommends that NUJ and other relevant bodies should hold politically exposed media accountable for ‘ unjournalistic’ practices during protest. To guide and safeguard the public, politically exposed media should be compelled to display “ political exposure disclosure” banner when reporting issues that affect the interests of the principal as a matter of social responsibility and ethics. To avoid, betrayal of public trust, non-politically exposed news media must not shy away from holding actors in social movements accountable through Attribution of Responsibility.