Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
cjls

Articles

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2023): CJLS: Volume 11, No 2 December 2023

AN INVESTIGATION OF SMS LANGUAGE IN WRITTEN ENGLISH COMPOSITIONS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS OF FEDERAL COLLEGE OF EDUCATION, ABEOKUTA

Submitted
March 17, 2025
Published
2025-03-26

Abstract

The popularity of SMS text abbreviations among students from the secondary school level to tertiary institutions has become increasingly evident in what passes as ‘good’ English.  SMS is a major form of communication in today’s day and age that has impacted in various areas especially in that of learning and teaching. The purpose of this study was to determine the non-standard English features in the written English of ESL pre-service teachers. This study also aimed to investigate the non-standard features that could be attributed to ESL pre-service teachers’ frequent use of SMS and its implications on teacher education in Nigeria. The study adopted the expost-facto descriptive survey approach. Two research questions and three hypotheses were raised to guide the study. A total of 81 ESL pre-service teachers and 6 lecturers participated in the study. Three instruments, teachers’ questionnaire, SMS forwarded by the students’ participants and a written composition test were used as the mode of data collection. The results of this study indicated that non-standard English features are present in the written composition of the ESL pre-service teachers. The results also showed a significant relationship between ESL pre-service teachers’ frequent use of SMS and their written composition. It was concluded that frequent usage of SMS language plays a great role in influencing ESL pre-service teachers written composition negatively. The implications for pre-service teacher education were discussed and recommendations were made.

References

  1. Baron, N. S. (2008). Always on: Language in an online and Mobile World. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Bieswanger, M. (2008). 2 abbrevi8 or not 2 abbrevia8: A contrastive analysis of different shortening strategies in England and German text messages.
  3. Bodunde, H.A., & Sotiloye, B.S. (2013). A Critique of Undergraduate Students’ Writing Skill in an ESL Setting: Samples from the Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. World Journal of English Language, 3, 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v3n2p10
  4. Chiluwa, I. (2008). Assessing the Nigerianness of SMS text-messages in English. English Today 24(1). 51-56.
  5. Crispin, T. (2003). Generation TXT? The Sociolinguistics of Young people’s text- messaging. Washington: Washington UP.
  6. Crystal, D. (2008). Txting: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford University Press
  7. Dansieh, S.A. (2011). SMS Texting and Its Potential Impacts on Students’ Written Communication Skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 222- 229.
  8. Derek, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83 (1), 3-34
  9. Fakeye, D.O. (2011). Locus of control as a Correlate of Achievement in English as a second language in Ibadan. The Journal of International Research volume, 4 (17)
  10. ---------- ( 2002). Effect of instruction in componential and rhetorical strategies on students' achievement and attitude to essay writing in Ibadan. Unpublished. Ph.D Thesis, Department of Teacher Education, University of Ibadan
  11. Holloway, J.( 2011). SMS and its negative effective on language.A contributionfrom (Retrieved on March 5, 2020).
  12. Mphahlele, M.L., & Mashamaite, K. (2005). The impact of short message service (sms) language on language proficiency learners and sms dictionaries. IADIS International conference mobile learning Journal, South Africa.
  13. O’Connor A. (2005). Instant Messaging: Friend or foe of student writing. Retrieved January, 2012 from http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/lite racy/O’Connor.htm
  14. Owolabi, D., & Bankole, M.A. (2013). The English Language in the ESL Classroom in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 1(4), 2321 – 2799.
  15. Plester, B., & Wood, C. (2006). Text msg n school literacy: does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment? Literacy, 42(3), 137-144. doi:10.3991/ijet.v5il.1010.
  16. Shaughnessy, M. (2008). An interview with Jacquie Ream: What’s happening with writing? Retrieved January, 2012 from http://ednews.org/articles/2537/1/1/an- interview-with-Jacquie-Ream- what039s.Happenings-with- writing/page1.html
  17. Short Message Service. 2008. Retrieved March 1 2018 from http://siteanalytics.complete.com/twitter.c om/?metric=uv
  18. Solomon, A.D. (2011). SMS texting and its potential Impacts on students’ written composition skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(2).
  19. Sutherland, J. (2002). Can U txt? The Guardian, 11 November 2002. Retrieved March 4, 2018 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/mobile/article/ 0.2763.837709.00.html
  20. Thurlow, C. (2003). Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text- messaging. Discourse Analysis Online. Retrieved January, 2012 from http://extra.shu.ac- uk/daol/articles/vl/nl,a3/thurlow20022000 3-paper.html
  21. Tomita, D.K. (2009).Text messaging and implications for its use in education. TCC 2009 Proceedings, 184 – 193.
  22. USA Today. (2008). Testing, Testing Destroys Kids’ writing style.
  23. WA Polytechnic. (2008). An investigation to the causes of poor performance of students’ in communication skills. Ghana.